• 399
  • 14
  • 3,839,136
  • done
Download
  • Dunkirk (2017) [1080p] [YTS.AG]
  • 1.6 GB
  • FREEMAN
  • Dunkirk 2017 1080p
  • English
  • 1080p
74%

Dunkirk (2017)

  • War
  • The story of the miraculous evacuation of Allied soldiers from Belgium, Britain, Canada and France, who were cut off and surrounded by the German army from the beaches and harbour of Dunkirk between May 26th and June 4th 1940 during World War II.

    expand_more
    English

    Reviews

    "Surely the filmmaker’s insistence upon imposing his favourite device upon all his narratives is edging towards Shyamalan-like overkill..." Read the full review here: http://screen-space.squarespace.com/reviews/2017/7/22/dunkirk.html

    I was a little disappointed with this movie. I expected much more. Cinematically it was brilliant and it was an event/action driven movie when left me feeling a little disconnected. We don't know anything about these characters that we see and I personally didn't feel any emotions for the movie, even though I wanted to. I found myself quite bored halfway through the movie, the whole time I kept expecting more.

    Tense film draws you to a doomed group. Those how are veteran war historians will quibble at some parts of Dunkirk, notably the separation of English and French troops in evacuation and the ships used to evacuate them. Dunkirk uses a few conceits to keep you involved. The first, which adds a notable amount of tension to the film, is a ticking clock in the background moving you to the final day. We see intercut scenes from different periods, prior, during and enacting the rout. Acting is excellent throughout, and versimilitude is achieved with models of aircraft, uniforms, landing stages and so on. Injections of friendship and subsequent loss direct our affection to the sufferers. Harry Styles is more than competent as a young troop and Kenneth Branagh brings integrity and verve to his role as a tired and firm leader. If one oversight might have been addressed, it is the lack of focus on the German side of things in this affair. Our few glimpses are of German fighters and so on, with very explanation of the goings-on at the front. Overall an excellent war movie meant to be among your top ten, if not top five (It will be hard to dislodge All Quiet on the Western Front, Apocalypse Now, Paths of Glory, Saving Private Ryan and Tora Tora Tora!, among others). Recommend highly a good 8/10.

    Dunkirk is a beautiful and unconventional World War 2 epic that is undoubtedly captivating, but it takes risks that may alienate some viewers. When people talk about a film they think it's about the setting, but it's actually about the characters. Saving Private Ryan isn't about World War 2. It tells a story about a squad of soldiers tasked with finding a young Private Ryan and getting him back safely to his family. Saying Dunkirk is a film about the Battle of Dunkirk however, is not inaccurate. The setting and characters are one. The choppy waters of the English Channel are equally as important, if not more so than the people who fought and died in them. As much as this makes for an interesting way to make a mainstream war film, it's also the reason why I wouldn't care to sit through it again. In some ways, it feels like watching a documentary with the narration turned off. I walked away impressed, and at the same time emotionally and intellectually unfulfilled.

    _Dunkirk_ was my best mate's favourite film of 2017. I find it difficult to understand exactly what drew him to this film so strongly. I find it difficult to say anything passionate about _Dunkirk_ at all. I think I arguably felt some tension in the earlier moments, and some of the shots were beautiful... I think? I honestly can't remember. _Dunkirk_ washed over me in the least impactful way possible, and then, like the tide, it was gone. _Final rating:★★ - Had some things that appeal to me, but a poor finished product._

    I want to start by saying I’m tired of seeing the big names in every movie I see, I think at times big name actors can take away from a movie more than benefit. Dunkirk did a great job of allowing us to focus less on the actors and more on the story. I feel this movie put me in the story and allowed to experience first hand some of the lives that were impacted. There wasn’t a lot of character building in this movie, but that’s what I loved, I feel like I was allowed to more so build on the experience over one person’s story. Since we’re not typically used to a movie being experience based over character based, I think some may find this as a flaw. I did not. There were multiple stories and perspectives, all which immerse you into the current situation. Christopher Nolan did a great job of creating an overwhelming feeling of hopelessness throughout the movie, I felt like I could never feel safe and constantly looked for a way out. I was on the edge of my seat for the majority of the movie. **Dunkirk was a great roller coaster ride that allowed a view one may otherwise never experience.**

    Okay first off, who came up with the idea "Let's all cast guys who look exactly the same"? With all the jumping around in the story I could not tell who was where and what was going on half the time. I see what he was trying to do on the cinematic side but it made it difficult as the viewer to fully follow it all the way. Production value was amazing and some of the scenes were absolutely stunning! Tom Hardy just flying over the coast was amazing. But Tom Hardy could not save this movie. I didn't know who was running where or if this person had died yet and the lack of dialogue was no help at all. Wouldn't watch it again

    I have put off viewing this film for quite a while. The main reason for this is that I am somewhat reluctant watching a movie where the story is pretty well known before you sit down to watch it. However a few days ago I finally did and, given all the hype, I have to say that I expected more, a lot more. Sure the movie is a cinematically very well down movie. Acting, camera and all that is excellent. Unfortunately that is all there is. First of all, where the hell did the over-inflated budget go? Dunkirk was a major undertaking with almost 400 000 soldiers involved and hundreds and hundreds of boats. We get to see what? A few columns of soldiers, a handful of boats and three pitiful spitfires against a bomber and two Fock Wulfes. To add to this insult we pretty much get to see the same bloody event over and over from different angles. This is an insult to all the brave men that made this rescue possible. There are a few likable people in the movie. Like the Navy commander and the elderly guy on the pleasure boat steaming to rescue. The rest are either psychotic or morons. Realism? Not so much. Like the scene where a bunch of soldiers are trapped in a boat being shot to pieces. Would any one in their right mind really have thought they could plug dozens and dozens of holes with their hands and then sail across the channel? Then we have the spitfire which runs out of fuel and glides around forever over the beach so the director can get some scenic shots done. Other times fairly large boats gets damaged and flips over in seconds. I would also have expected some pre-story. Some build up. But no, the story starts right away with these measly handful of boats and planes taking for bloody ever to drag themselves over to where they are supposed to go. Quite a disappointment indeed.

    Comments

    1 year ago

    Short and Simple Review by WubsTheFadgerChristopher Nolan has delivered another stunning and emotional film. The story is powerful, emotional, and inspired. The story is expertly separated from past, current, and future experiences shared by a few characters. All the characters show various treats from cowardice, courage, honor, pride, and sacrifice. The story can be a little confusing to watch, but after a second viewing it clears things us.The dialogue, or lack of dialogue, is amazing. The facial expressions and use of music to express tone, mood, and intentions are stunning.The acting is great. Tom Hardy, Fionn Whitehead, Mark Rylance, and Cillian Murphy perform the best. Aneurin Bonnard, Barry Keoghan, Tom Glynn-Carney, Jack Lowden, and Harry Styles (surprisingly) also perform well. The dogfight sequences are the best part of the film. The use of practical effects and the amount of extras is what makes the film seem real.The amount of powerful and emotional moments are few, but they are extremely potent. The ending is sobering yet inspiring. It shows us that patriotism and sacrifice can lead to hope.Pros: Powerful story, good dialogue, facial expressions and lack of dialogue are great, amazing acting, Tom Hardy's performance is stunning, dogfight sequences, practical effects and the staggering amount of extras, extremely potent emotional moments, and a great endingCons: The story can be hard to follow at some points and there is a scene about an hour and a half in (Tom Hardy is in a plane over the beach) that looks fakeOverall Rating: 9.0

    1 year ago

    Honestly, no backstory, non-existent plot, no characters, nothing. Just a bunch of soldiers, running around and hiding throughout the ENTIRE movie, without any lines. I almost fell asleep

    1 year ago

    Its was awesome.if u r fall in love with movie like marevel and dc its not ur movie. but if u r fan of real movies its best movie thay made in these 5 or 6 years sound ruleplay camera writter every thing r best. try wathc it in home with headset and u wuill fall in love with movie. he was deserv for all Positive reviews from Cinema critics

    1 year ago

    The loudest movie ever made.

    1 year ago

    Thanks for the upload

    1 year ago

    Pretty cool film could of done better. I watched mine on here - cbldc.io/eac4a49 - cuz i could not find working subtitles and this one only had the subtitles that worked. had to do verification but worth it :)

    1 year ago

    Why 1hr 46min. Where has rest 14 min gone?

    1 year ago

    Could you at least add the file details to the description like video dimensions and audio details like the other uploaders do.

    1 year ago

    k

    1 year ago

    plz upload dual audio hindi / eng

    1 year ago

    Thanks

    1 year ago

    thanks, maybe I'll need it.

    1 year ago

    I get that a lot... just close that window and try again, should be good after that.To the uploader, thanks for the effort... downloading now.

    1 year ago

    I'm not getting that message at all

    1 year ago

    @ eco4ever 1InSaNeO's solution should work, just click on the link a second time. Are you running Chrome on XP? Lack of valid updates will also cause that. Or on Explorer you could either reset your SSL protocols or modify them to connect over a non secured connection.<< Edited by beenthdonedat on Dec/07/2017 >> The first and great commandment is, Don’t let them scare you.Elmer Davis

    1 year ago

    Can anyone give any information about the media streams in this release, or even what container it uses? I've noticed several of these releases lately where absolutely no media information is gives aside from a vertical resolution number. Is the audio 5.1? Is it AAC, AC3, etc.? Is the video xvid, x.264, x.265? I make my decision on which torrent to download based entirely on that information, and I imagine a lot of other people do as well.

    1 year ago

    @oghakiVideo is x.264Resolution is 1920x1090Audio is 2-channel, 16-bit/48kHz AAC |Darkgrace|

    1 year ago

    A talented boy named Christopher was not indifferent to cinema since childhood. His first "home-movie" he tried to shoot, barely ten years old, armed with his father's 8-millimeter camera. The main roles in the first "movies" of a small fan of the "Star Wars" were played by the toy soldiers donated by the father (unfortunately, the permanent companion of Christopher's film career, Michael Kane, at that time was "intercepted" by Richard Attenborough for filming in another war movie). Almost 30 years of persistent directorial work. 9 full-length films, each of which is not familiar with the rental fiasco. Total fees of more than $ 4 billion for all work and a "loud" name. In the age of glory sin can not remember youth? And so, in the jubilee project, "Dunkirk" - Christopher Nolan returns to his first "director's" experience - military history. Only "soldiers" this time - not a toy.Taking your favorite 70-millimeter film, a lot of natural scenery (minimum digital recording and green screens, gentlemen, only old school), loyal comrades (Zimmer, Van Hiteim, Crowley, Smith), and got several working "Spitfires" and "Messerschmitt", Christopher says: "I want to shoot a visually beautiful movie." And in Dunkirk he did it in his corporate style - with the inherent color effects a la "The Dark Knight", the epic scenes of air battles, the sinking of ships and the endless "bombing" that look no less qualitative than the fall of Cooper in Gargantua or a scene with a wave in Interstellar. But this was clearly not enough. And Christopher Nolan proclaimed: "More realism!". Operator Hoyte Van Hoytem should not be repeated twice. He unhooked a 100-kilogram IMAX 3D camera from a suspended tripod and, in an old-fashioned way, took off all the "ground" scenes from his shoulder. Voila, "Dunkirk" becomes the first film where IMAX shooting was done "by hand" - the work received a lot of realistic scenes from the face of desperate British troops, filled with panic, Nolan confirmed the title of "experimental film-maker", and Van Hoite moderately missed the gym . Ideally."Dunkirk" is a screen reproduction of the famous in the history of Great Britain operation "Dynamo". In 1940, nearly 400,000 discouraged allies (mostly British) were pushed back by the German army to the small French port city of Dunkirk, on the English Channel. In conditions of total economy of military resources, involving civil courts, Great Britain begins the largest rescue operation. Christopher Nolan offers us his vision of these events and gives us a chance to look at them from three angles. Firstly, from the air - on behalf of the pilots of the Royal Air Force, at all times seeking through the strait to help their associates. Secondly, from the sea - on behalf of the crew of a small civilian ship, which is also sent to Dunkirk to assist in the evacuation of the British corps. And, thirdly, on behalf of desperate soldiers, who are eager to survive and get home, at any cost. Christopher Nolan, in spite of his fears, was inspired not by the Spielberg story of the salvation of Private Ryan and not even by Stoun's "Platoon", but (!) "Nonstop action" - "Speed" and "Unmanaged." The genre of "Dunkirk" smoothly balances between the "vigorous" thriller and worthy "war-movie", and the suspense - just off scale. In addition, the director immerses us in a non-linear narrative, saturated with flashbacks and endless action in the spirit of the film "Remember." We can observe the picture of the bombing of the shore from the land, and in a few minutes - the same scene, but already from the fuselage of the Spitfire.A few words about music. Oh, the seventh was scorching. Hans Zimmer, are you human? From the very first minutes, the soundtrack began, which did not end at all until the final credits, alternating only its tempo. Due to this, "Dunkirk" looks in one breath, in the truest sense of the word. I do not want to go into a detailed description of the impressions - I just wait for Zimmer's music to be called the classics of the 21st century.But fans of the deep "Nolan" story are waiting for the sad news. In "Dunkirk" the director, not wishing to go beyond the historical framework, relied on reliability and coverage. There is a minimum of metaphoricality, a minimum of a unique fantasy, a minimum of understatement with respect to the plot and a maximum of understatement with respect to the characters. Calling the main character (Finn Whitehead) by the name "Tommy" (if we collectively called the Germans "Fritzes", the Germans generally called the British "Tommies"), Nolan seems to seek to "generalize" and project on his fate and feelings the experiences of all who was in this situation - to create the effect of an impersonal mass. All this reminded me madly Remarque and his "On the Western Front without Change" - a real war, without "superheroes" (and was it not for this that the "eminent" cast was slightly overshadowed?), Impregnated with despair, a thirst for survival and whistling bullets from an invisible enemy.Caesar could simultaneously read one text and dictate another. Walter White - at the same time teach chemistry and "cook meth." Well, and Christopher Nolan damn well knows how to combine the position of a talented screenwriter and an unrivaled director. And, perhaps, he once again proved it. "Dunkirk" is the tenth, anniversary work of Christopher Nolan. "Powerful" historical film with an invigorating suspense and dizzying visualization. A minimum of digital effects, a maximum of material props and "cardboard" decorations - a balm for the soul for all fans of the "old school" of cinema. Unfortunately (or not), the "genius" of the play played to the detriment of the "uniqueness" of the script - the fans of "Beginning", "Prestige" and "Interstellar" will definitely wait for some disappointment. In all other respects, the signature handwriting of the master of a large-scale movie is felt in every minute of the time-keeping.You will like this movie, ladies and gentlemen, rest assured. Enjoy watching!

    5 months ago

    Good quality. Thanks. Info: Format : MPEG-4 File size : 1.65 GiB Duration : 1 h 46 min Overall bit rate : 2 211 kb/s Video Format : AVC Format/Info : Advanced Video Codec Codec ID/Info : Advanced Video Coding Duration : 1 h 46 min Bit rate : 2 050 kb/s Width : 1 920 pixels Height : 1 072 pixels Display aspect ratio : 16:9 Frame rate mode : Constant Frame rate : 23.976 (24000/1001) FPS Bit depth : 8 bits Scan type : Progressive Stream size : 1.53 GiB (93%) Writing library : x264 core 152 Audio Format : AAC Format/Info : Advanced Audio Codec Duration : 1 h 46 min Bit rate mode : Constant Bit rate : 156 kb/s Channel(s) : 2 channels Channel positions : Front: L R Sampling rate : 48.0 kHz Frame rate : 46.875 FPS (1024 spf) Compression mode : Lossy Stream size : 119 MiB (7%)

    Files

    WWW.YTS.AG.jpg 106 kB
    Dunkirk.2017.1080p.BluRay.x264-[YTS.AG].mp4 1.8 GB
    Dunkirk (2017) [1080p] [YTS.AG]/WWW.YTS.AG.jpg 103 kB
    Dunkirk (2017) [1080p] [YTS.AG]/Dunkirk.2017.1080p.BluRay.x264-[YTS.AG].mp4 1.6 GB
    Dunkirk (2017) [1080p] [yts.bypassed.org]/WWW.yts.bypassed.org.jpg 103 kB
    Dunkirk (2017) [1080p] [yts.bypassed.org]/Dunkirk.2017.1080p.BluRay.x264-[yts.bypassed.org].mp4 1.6 GB

    Stream

    Downloading Seeding Dunkirk (2017) [1080p] [YTS.AG] from to 0 peers.
    of
    0 b/s / ↗0 b/s